<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lensblog &#187; avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lensbox.za.net/tag/avatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lensbox.za.net</link>
	<description>a geek’s mark on the wired world while exploring media and gaming metaverses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar</title>
		<link>http://blog.lensbox.za.net/2009/12/30/avatar/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lensbox.za.net/2009/12/30/avatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lensbox.za.net/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I finally got to see it last night at Montecasino&#8230; Tickets were a bit dear but, in retrospect, well worth it. I&#8217;m not going to spoil the story for those that haven&#8217;t seen it yet, but I will elaborate on some of the elements of the movie that I really enjoyed. Firstly, let me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I finally got to see it last night at Montecasino&#8230; Tickets were a bit dear but, in retrospect, well worth it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to spoil the story for those that haven&#8217;t seen it yet, but I will elaborate on some of the elements of the movie that I really enjoyed.</p>
<p>Firstly, let me get the science fiction aspect out of the way. I&#8217;ve seen a lot of complaints in reviews regarding the science in the movie and it saddens me that the general concept of Hollywood science fiction has been limited to extreme sci-fi such as blasters or lasers, robots and outlandish alien spacecraft. And as for aliens&#8230; not every alien needs to be Giger-esque.</p>
<p>Science fiction to me has always been the vision a writer has, casting their mind&#8217;s eye forth to what they feel could be a possible and sometimes plausible future. Looking back at some of the grandmasters of sci-fi in the last century, even they admitted that if they knew then what they knew now, their stories would be very different. (I&#8217;m almost positive this was said by Arthur C Clarke&#8230;)</p>
<p>Science has moved in leaps and bounds in the last few years, but not so much so that we can abandon all logic when it comes to constructing a possible future scenario. Sure, some folks seem to think that given the gap in time between present and depicted future that we&#8217;d have come up with something better&#8230; Personally, I&#8217;m of the opinion that we, as a race, tend to grasp at a concept then spend the next century making it better. One needs only look at our present modes of transport. At it&#8217;s core, the mechanics are not that far removed from the original. We&#8217;ve simply made them faster, stronger, hopefully safer, more intelligent. Sure there have been some outlandish alternatives and hybrids that have been proposed over the years, but they tend to die out after a while due to various reasons such as funding, price, odd energy requirements, overall feasability or mainstream acceptance.</p>
<p>So, taking that into account, let&#8217;s look at some of the human science in the movie:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">a) <strong>Amplified Mobility Platform</strong> or <strong>AMP </strong>Suit &#8211; yep, the big walkers that act as extensions of the pilot&#8217;s body. It&#8217;s not a stretch of the imagination to think that this might be possible considering the current exo-skeletons in research and production at present. That and I think it&#8217;s a nice tip of the proverbial hat to the power loader exo-skeleton from Aliens&#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">b) The <strong>Scorpion </strong>Gunship &#8211; I&#8217;ve always had a fascination with VTOL flight and VTOL/conventional flight hybrids. Helicopters are great but their design feels a little dated. The Scorpion is, to me at least, a refreshing update that borrows aspects of the aggresive Apache and Hind choppers and throws in a little UNSC Hornet VTOL gunship from Halo 3.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">c) Similarly, the <strong>Samson </strong>has taken it&#8217;s cues from the old faithful multipurpose Bell UH-1 &#8220;Huey&#8221; and Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk, a design that has been echoed in Command &amp; Conquer&#8217;s Orca bomber/fighter, Halo&#8217;s AV-14 Hornet, Fallout&#8217;s Vertibirds and Starcraft 2&#8242;s Banshee.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">d) The <strong>Dragon</strong>, in my mind, is a large VTOL version of my old favourites, the versatile &#8220;death from above&#8221; C-130 Gunship. Large enough to be a troop transport or carry vehicles and other payloads or outfitted as an aerial artillery platform.</p>
<p>One of the big &#8220;Wow!&#8221; factors for me was the holographics. Yes, it&#8217;s been overdone so many times, but I still marvel at them. Especially if they make sense. So often, in science fiction movies, the user interface they&#8217;re tapping away at makes no sense.</p>
<p>Ok, enough drooling over the hardware&#8230; Onto the software!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the Adobe product suite. I&#8217;ve been Photoshopping since 1996 and it&#8217;s still my preferred image editing platform. The other programs in the suite are a bit foreign to me, but having seen their usage in this film as well as in other projects, I&#8217;m astounded at the results.</p>
<p>The other (and major factor in the movie) was the motion capture, specifically the facial expressions and fluidity of movements in the Na&#8217;vi. We saw what was possible with Gollum in Lord of the Rings. This&#8230; this was just better than anything I could imagine.</p>
<p>Finally, the mixing of CG and &#8216;normal&#8217; camera work. I pride myself on being fairly critical of CG artistry, having spent many many hours, days, weeks on my own admittedly simple projects, and browsing through others&#8217; online projects for inspiration. After a while you can spot elements that seem out of place, superimposed or added in after the fact. With Avatar, in this initial viewing at least, I could not tell the difference between real and CG. Maybe in a second or third viewing where I can ignore the action sequences and concentrate on the overall graphics&#8230; but even then, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be disappointed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this&#8230; this movie is not for everyone. Some, will avoid it purely because of the hype. Some, will scoff at the movie, calling it &#8220;Dances with Smurfs&#8221; or something along those lines because they feel that the story has been overdone. Others will not be able to watch it because they cannot sit through 2 and a half hours of 3D without getting a headache or eyestrain.</p>
<p>However, for those that do go see it and enjoy it, it&#8217;s fast becoming &#8220;that&#8221; movie that they talk about, marvel over or go to see numerous times.</p>
<p>If Pandora was real and the Avatar program existed, I&#8217;d sign up today! Until then, I&#8217;ll eagerly await the DVD or Blu-ray release so I can relive the adventure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lensbox.za.net/2009/12/30/avatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
